subscribe
e-newsletter
digital edition
reader service
advertise
    Subscribe to GreenSource the magazine
of sustainable design: $19.95 for one year
comment

Sunny Skies for Third Decathlon

“This competition is much more than an elaborate experiment by a bunch of college kids.”

10/2007

By David Sadighian

Exchanging facebook for photovoltaics, 20 teams of university students will compete in the U.S. Department of Energy’s third Solar Decathlon, between October 12 and 20 on the National Mall in Washington, D.C.

Denver Solar Park
Photos courtesy: Carnegie Mellon

Denver Solar Park

Rate this project:
Based on what you have seen and read about this project, how would you grade it? Use the stars below to indicate your assessment, five stars being the highest rating.
----- Advertising -----

Contestants are selected by the Department of Energy (DOE) and allotted a stipend of $100,000 to design, engineer, and construct a high-performance solar home over the course of two years. The home is then displayed in Washington for visitors and judges.
“The Decathlon helps move solar- energy technologies into the marketplace faster,” says DOE representative John Horst. “The main objective is for students to come away with the ability to work with these technologies.”

The 2007 competition will feature the designs of eleven new and nine returning teams, selected from universities in the U. S. and Puerto Rico, Germany, Spain, and Canada. The solar-powered homes will be judged in ten different categories ranging from architecture (worth the most points), to market viability (new this year), and even on a “getting around” quotient, which calculates the miles traveled of electric cars docked at each home’s solar energy network.

The competition will test each team’s ability to create a functioning, 800-square-foot, single-family residence with no external energy sources and a zero-carbon footprint. But aside from integrating contemporary technologies and high-performance systems, an
aesthetic standard is also included in the rubric.

“The idea is that they’re trying to seamlessly blend solar technologies into the design of a home,” Horst says.

The Decathlon debuted in 2002 with a smaller scope: 14 teams competed with only $5,000 each in funding. Since the 2005 competition, Horst says, funding and interest in the Decathlon has increased, resulting in more complex solutions and solar energy systems.

Alex Miller, captain of the University of Texas at Austin team and 2007 graduate in architecture, notes that the Decathlon supplemented his studies by providing a thorough education in construction. “The process shows you what an eighth of an inch really means,” he says, referring to the symbolic nature of architectural drawings versus the realities of construction.

The UT-Austin team enrolled 100 students in disciplines including engineering, fine arts, architecture, graphic design, and business to design and market their solar house. Like their competitors, a team of 20 members constructed the design on campus. It will be dissembled and transported to the National Mall for this month’s competition.

The University of Colorado at Boulder team, the champion of the 2002 and 2005 competitions, plans to bring only a fraction of their 2,100-square-foot home to the competition.

“One of the shortcomings of the competition is that the systems are over-sized to produce much more power than typical residences require,” says Chad Corbin, Boulder team captain and graduate student. Corbin intends for their design, comparable to the average American home, to “help demonstrate to the public that this competition is much more than an elaborate experiment by a bunch of college students.”

Nonetheless, the Decathlon remains a testing ground for fledging student architects and engineers to play with the possibilities of solar power. After listing UT-Austin’s glut of high-performance data, Alex Miller reveals another feature of their home: a solar thermal hot tub, which he plans to demo with swimsuit-clad Longhorns. Miller says, “we’re trying to make it fun, approachable, and energy efficient.”

 

share: more »

This article appeared in the October 2007 print issue of GreenSource Magazine.
Subscribe to GreenSource in print | Back Issues | Manage your subsciption | Read GreenSource digitally

Reader Comments:

We welcome comments from all points of view. Off-topic or abusive comments, however, will be removed at the editors’ discretion.

----- Advertising -----
Click here to go to Reader Service Page
Daily Headlines
GREENSOURCE MAGAZINE
GreenSource Selects: Blogs

View all blogs >>
Recently Posted Reader Photos

View all photo galleries >>
Recent Forum Discussions

View all forum discusions >>